I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
theory Defs imports Main begin end
theory Submission imports Defs begin lemma induct_pcpl: "\<lbrakk>P []; \<And>x. P [x]; \<And>x y zs. P zs \<Longrightarrow> P (x # y # zs)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P xs" by induction_schema (pat_completeness, lexicographic_order) lemma split_splice: "\<exists>ys zs. xs = splice ys zs \<and> length ys \<ge> (length xs) div 2 \<and> length zs \<ge> (length xs) div 2" proof(induction xs rule: induct_pcpl) case 1 show ?case sorry next case (2 x) show ?case sorry next case (3 y z xs) show ?case sorry qed lemma eq_identiy: fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" assumes "\<forall>n. f(Suc n) = f(n)^2" shows "f(n) = f(0)^(2^n)" sorry end
theory Check imports Submission begin lemma split_splice: "\<exists>ys zs. xs = splice ys zs \<and> length ys \<ge> (length xs) div 2 \<and> length zs \<ge> (length xs) div 2" by(rule split_splice) lemma eq_identiy: fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" assumes "\<forall>n. f(Suc n) = f(n)^2" shows "f(n) = f(0)^(2^n)" by(rule eq_identiy[OF assms]) end